Prentice v. UDC Advisory Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a judicial admission made in a motion to dismiss and repeated in an appellate brief is “binding and incontrovertible”
• holding assertion in a motion to dismiss was binding judicial admission
• referring to promissory estoppel as “a doctrine which is intended to permit recovery for promises which lack consideration”
• finding judicial admission based on unequivocal assertion in motion to dismiss and reply memorandum in support of motion to dismiss regarding whether a contract existed in a breach of contract case
• “Promissory estoppel cannot be based upon a promise which only induces plaintiffs to do that which they were already bound to do.”
• judicial admission where party asserted in motion to dismiss and reply memorandum that written contract existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).