· 11/17/1896
Prendergast v. Dwelling House Insurance
Citations
- 67 Mo. App. 426
- 1896 Mo. App. LEXIS 426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Branham specifically argued in his petition for rehearing that the supreme court declare its decision only applied prospectively based on fairness and justice to the parties. Despite Branham’s argument, the supreme court denied his petition for rehearing.”
- “Branham specifically argued in his petition for rehearing that the supreme court declare its decision only applied prospectively based on fairness and justice to the parties. Despite Branham’s argument, the supreme court denied his petition for rehearing.”
- “Branham specifically argued in his petition for rehearing that the supreme court declare its decision only applied prospectively based on fairness and justice to the parties. Despite Branham’s argument, the supreme court denied his petition for rehearing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.