Skip to main content
· 11/17/1896

Prendergast v. Dwelling House Insurance

Citations

  • 67 Mo. App. 426
  • 1896 Mo. App. LEXIS 426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Branham specifically argued in his petition for rehearing that the supreme court declare its decision only applied prospectively based on fairness and justice to the parties. Despite Branham’s argument, the supreme court denied his petition for rehearing.”
  • “Branham specifically argued in his petition for rehearing that the supreme court declare its decision only applied prospectively based on fairness and justice to the parties. Despite Branham’s argument, the supreme court denied his petition for rehearing.”
  • “Branham specifically argued in his petition for rehearing that the supreme court declare its decision only applied prospectively based on fairness and justice to the parties. Despite Branham’s argument, the supreme court denied his petition for rehearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.