Skip to main content
· 7/1/1983

Premium Foods, Incorporated, and v. National Labor Relations Board, And

Citations

  • 709 F.2d 623
  • 113 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3261
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding successorship even though 98 percent of new business’s sales were to food service area as compared to 60 percent for predecessor
  • though union demand timely, sent to wrong company also involved in the transfer
  • “where the successor takes over from a business in full operation, even if the successor has plans for expansion, a representative complement is usually present on the date the new employer begins”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Choy, Fletcher, MacBRIDE

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.