Skip to main content
· 1/28/1994

Premier Ins. Co. v. Adams

Citations

  • 632 So. 2d 1054
  • 1994 WL 20931

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that when an insurance policy is \ambiguous or fairly susceptible to two reasonable interpretations\ the policy will be \construed strictly against the insurer\
  • “[A]n interpretation which gives a reasonable meaning to all provisions of a contract is preferred to one which leaves a part useless or inexplicable.”
  • “[A]n interpretation which gives a reasonable meaning to all provisions of a contract is preferred to one which leaves a part useless or inexplicable.”
  • policy language which is ambiguous is generally to be construed against the insurer
  • a contract interpretation which gives reasonable meaning to all provisions is preferred
  • “an interpretation which gives a reasonable meaning to all provisions of a contract is preferred to one which leaves a part useless or inexplicable” (citing First Nat’l Bank v. Savannah, F. & W. Ry. Co., 18 So. 345 (Fla. 1895)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goshorn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.