Premier Commercial Corp. v. FMC Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that a deposition “of any person identified as an expert witness may be taken” under Rule 26(b)(4), regardless of if the expert was retained or specially employed
• noting distinction in Rule 26(b)(4) between experts required to submit Rule 26(a)(2)(B) reports and other experts, such as treating physicians
• “Under Rule 26(a)(2)(A), a party is required to disclose the identity of all persons who may be used at trial to present testimony under Fed. R. Evid. 702, 703, and 705. However, under Rule 26(a)(2)(13
• “The determining issue is the scope of the proposed testimony”
• “The determinative issue is the scope of the proposed testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).