Skip to main content
· 8/24/1994

Preferred Mut. Ins. Co. v. Martinez

Citations

  • 643 So. 2d 1101
  • 1994 WL 454876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding insurer never acted inconsistently with its right to appraisal because it filed a motion to dismiss and compel appraisal after the insureds filed suit
  • reversing denial of motion to compel appraisal because such motions “should be granted” whenever the insurance policy includes an appraisal provision
  • \courts have construed appraisal provisions in insurance policies and have treated these provisions as arbitration provisions\
  • reversing denial of motion to compel appraisal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hubbart, Baskin and Cope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.