Preferred America Insurance v. Dulceak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “mutuality of parties is no longer required[ ]” for offensive issue preclusion (citation omitted)
• inquiring whether “the minimum elements of the doctrine are satisfied and it is clear that no unfairness will result to the party being estopped” (emphasis supplied)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).