Preece v. Coiner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• guoting United States v. W.T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629, 632-33 (1953)
• guoting Murphy v. Hunt, 455 U.S. 478, 482 (1982) (per curiam)
• “Where declaratory relief is sought, plaintiff must show that there is a substantial controversy over present rights of sufficient immediacy and reality requiring adjudication.”
• “‘When the issues presented are no longer live or the 11 The Clerk’s Office supplied this figure as of September 25, 2023 plus interest and minus fees. parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome,’ the case is moot”
• exception does not apply where cessation not “voluntary”
• exception does not apply where cessation not \voluntary\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).