Skip to main content
· 9/20/2000

Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 116 F. Supp. 2d 1350
  • 24 Ct. Int'l Trade 1016
  • 24 C.I.T. 1016
  • 22 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2030
  • 2000 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing change to statutory provisions detailing the process by which Customs makes changes to its practice or position
  • considering whéther stainless steel scrap was manufactured or produced within the meaning of the manufacturing substitution drawback statute
  • “[i]f that statute is clear on its face, the court must follow Congressional intent, regardless of the existence of an interpretation by Customs to the contrary”
  • “[i]f that statute is clear on its face, the court must follow Congressional intent, regardless of the existence of an interpretation by Customs to the contrary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.