Precision Development, Inc. v. Crescent Properties, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an error is plain where the record is devoid of any evidence from which the court could find that defendant’s criminal conduct resulted in the contested damages
• exercising discretion to correct an unpreserved error in awarding $273 of restitution
• “The amount of restitution is not insubstantial given defen- dant’s circumstances; moreover, the interests of justice mili- tate against requiring a defendant to pay an obligation that is totally unsubstantiated by the record.”
• the trial court's inclusion of $273 to Care Oregon in the restitution award was plain error because \the record was devoid of any evidence from which the court could find that defendant's criminal conduct resulted in economic damages\
• exer- cising our discretion to correct $273 restitution award to an insurance company unsupported by evidence because the “the interests of justice militate against requiring a defen- dant to pay an obligation that is totally unsubstantiated by the record”
• exercising discretion to correct a plainly erroneous restitution award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).