Skip to main content
· 2/25/1980

Precision Castparts Corp. v. Johnson & Higgins of Oregon, Inc.

Citations

  • 607 P.2d 763
  • 44 Or. App. 739
  • 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 2272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agent had duty to inform plaintiff of the \significant distinctions between the alternative insurance policies under consideration\
  • when an agent presents an insured with a number of policies for consideration, the agent has a duty to inform the insured regarding the differences between the policies under consideration
  • duty may be created to warn about significant distinctions among insurance policies customer is considering purchasing
  • where agency relationship existed, “plaintiff had a right to rely on the superior expertise of its agent and had the right to assume that its agent performed its duty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buttler, Gillette, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.