Skip to main content
· 9/19/2003

Precept Medical Products, Inc. v. Klus

Citations

  • 282 F. Supp. 2d 381
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16666
  • 2003 WL 22200583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “for the purposes of a Rule 12(b)(2) motion, the Court will accept the Plaintiff’s version of disputed facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thornburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.