Preble v. Reed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if a new trial is granted and later withdrawn, the appellate deadlines run from the later order granting reinstatement rather than the earlier order
• holding that if a new trial is granted and later withdrawn, the appellate deadlines run from the later order granting reinstatement rather than the earlier order
• noting that where respondent trial judge is no longer in office, court shall address such issue even if parties have not
• explaining that if a new trial is granted and later withdrawn, the appellate deadlines run from the later order reinstating the judgment
• noting that where respondent trial judge is no longer in office, court shall address such issue even if parties have not
• explaining that abatement is required “to allow the successor [judge] to reconsider the order”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).