Skip to main content
· 7/1/1873

Preble v. Inhabitants of Gilead

Citations

  • 63 Me. 321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In Cepero, there was a complete omission of a significant and clearly relevant past injury, misleading the medical expert to find the claimant’s injury to be entirely work-related.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Appleton, Barrows, Daneorth, Dickerson, Virgin, Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.