· 7/1/1873
Preble v. Inhabitants of Gilead
Citations
- 63 Me. 321
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In Cepero, there was a complete omission of a significant and clearly relevant past injury, misleading the medical expert to find the claimant’s injury to be entirely work-related.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Appleton, Barrows, Daneorth, Dickerson, Virgin, Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.