Skip to main content
· 12/15/2009

Praxair Tech. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

Citations

  • 988 A.2d 92
  • 201 N.J. 126
  • 2009 N.J. LEXIS 1406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that corporation with no physical presence or employees in State was “doing business” under CBT Act due to licensing of its intangible assets for use by other business entities in the State
  • “[t]he Director’s exercise of his regulatory powers is circumscribed by the taxing authority in fact conferred by the Legislature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rivera-Soto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.