Pratt v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the presence of twenty-five uniformed correctional officers after close of evidence by prior to jury instructions did not create inherent prejudice depriving defendant of a fair trial
• presence of twenty-five uniformed correctional officers after close of evidence but prior to jury instructions did not create inherent prejudice depriving defendant of a fair trial
• no inherent prejudice denying fair trial where twenty-five uniformed correctional officers in gallery to observe closing arguments were in back of room, away from jury, and several had been witnesses sequestered during testimony phase of trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2013-07-16· cited 155×
• Hicks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-03-28· cited 17×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-05-31· cited 13×
• Murchison v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-31· cited 4×
• Stogisavlijevic v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-01-27

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Illinois v. Allen
  Supreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
• Estelle v. Williams
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-21· cited 2,305×
• Holbrook v. Flynn
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 1,122×
• Spivey v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1984-07-02· cited 163×
• Allen v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1975-11-24· cited 76×
• Lemley v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1980-02-27· cited 25×