Pratt v. Smart Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding voluntary payment doctrine “does not come into play in situations involving a transaction that violates public policy”
• finding that an attorney obtaining records from Smart acted on behalf of the client as disclosed principal and was not a party to the transaction
• holding voluntary payment doctrine “does not come into play in situations involving a transaction that violates public policy”
• finding that the Medical Records Act authorized a private cause of action by reason of the fact that it allowed for recovery of “actual damages” for willful or reckless violations
• voluntary payment doctrine does not come into play in situations involving a transaction that violates public policy
• voluntary payment doctrine does not come into play in situations involving a transaction that violates public policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).