Pratt v. Craft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting motion to dismiss where the plaintiff 23 made no allegations that his injuries resulted from the private entity’s polices or customs
• finding no state action, and dismissing Section 1983 complaint, where private security guards at federal building allegedly tackled and handcuffed plaintiff
• allegations suggesting “that the security guards had some power to detain a person on the premises, temporarily confiscate personal property . . . , and place a person in handcuffs” were “insufficient under the public function test”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).