· 6/5/1888
Pratt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Citations
- 38 Minn. 455
- 38 N.W. 356
- 1888 Minn. LEXIS 432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court ruled for plaintiff on grounds of estoppel because defendant had failed to raise timely objection to jurisdiction in a prior suit
- court ruled for plaintiff on grounds of estoppel because defendant had failed to raise timely objection to jurisdiction in a prior suit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mitchell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.