Skip to main content
· 6/5/1888

Pratt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Citations

  • 38 Minn. 455
  • 38 N.W. 356
  • 1888 Minn. LEXIS 432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court ruled for plaintiff on grounds of estoppel because defendant had failed to raise timely objection to jurisdiction in a prior suit
  • court ruled for plaintiff on grounds of estoppel because defendant had failed to raise timely objection to jurisdiction in a prior suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mitchell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.