· 6/11/1991
Pratt Ex Rel. Pratt v. Mitchell Hollow Irrigation Co.
Citations
- 813 P.2d 1169
- 162 Utah Adv. Rep. 19
- 1991 Utah LEXIS 52
- 1991 WL 101163
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- listing \three reasons why canal owners/operators are not subject to the attractive nuisance doctrine\
- ―Generally, a landowner owes no duty to a trespasser, except to refrain from causing willful and wanton injury to him or her.‖ (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zimmerman, Hall, Howe, Durham, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.