· 10/21/2003
Prats v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
Citations
- 800 N.E.2d 351
- 100 N.Y.2d 878
- 768 N.Y.S.2d 178
- 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 3312
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiff’s work inspecting and adjusting air conditioner units throughout office building were alterations that fell within the purview of NYLL § 240(1)
- “The intent of the statute was to protect workers employed in the enumerated acts, even while performing duties ancillary to those acts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rosenblatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.