Skip to main content
· 10/21/2003

Prats v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

Citations

  • 800 N.E.2d 351
  • 100 N.Y.2d 878
  • 768 N.Y.S.2d 178
  • 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 3312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff’s work inspecting and adjusting air conditioner units throughout office building were alterations that fell within the purview of NYLL § 240(1)
  • “The intent of the statute was to protect workers employed in the enumerated acts, even while performing duties ancillary to those acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosenblatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.