· 3/9/1918
Prather v. Eden
Citations
- 102 Kan. 545
- 171 P. 635
- 1918 Kan. LEXIS 89
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Agency — Commissions—Fraud—Separate Trials. The court properly exercised its discretion in refusing- separate trials of the issues.</p> <p>2. Same — Fraud—Burden of Proof. The burden of proving fraud was properly placed on the party alleging it.</p> <p>3. Same — Instructions—Neto Trial. There was no error respecting instructions or in refusing a new trial. / '</p>
Judges: West
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.