Skip to main content

Prater v. State

Citations

  • 469 S.E.2d 780
  • 220 Ga. App. 506
  • 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1189
  • 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • judgment reversed because defendant not told the nature of the charges, the range of allowable punishment, and possible defenses
  • although evidence against defendant was “ample,” error was harmful because record showed defendant was “confused, disorganized, and ill-equipped for handling the case”
  • defendant “confused, disorganized, and ill-equipped for handling the case” and inadequately warned beforehand of these dangers
  • judgment reversed because defendant not told the nature of the charges, the range of allowable punishment, and possible defenses
  • harmful error where defendant was “confused, disorganized, and ill-equipped for handling the case” and was “inadequately warned beforehand” of dangers of proceeding pro se
  • although evidence was ample, error not harmless where defendant was “confused, disorganized, and ill-equipped for handling the case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beasley, Pope, Ruffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.