Prateek Jain v. Sarika Samantha Wadhawan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding substantial evidence supported denial of CAT relief where petitioner failed to establish the government tortures “those with gang- related tattoos”
• finding no government “acquiescence” where “the government actively, albeit not entirely successfully, combats the illegal activities”
• “A case is not moot when there is some possible remedy, even a partial remedy or one not requested by the plaintiff.”
• “Salvadoran law prohibits extrajudicial killings and violence, and there is substantial evidence that the government enforces those laws—albeit imperfectly—against both gang members and rogue police officers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).