Skip to main content
· 2/26/1988

Pranzo v. Itec, Inc.

Citations

  • 521 So. 2d 983
  • 1988 Ala. LEXIS 93
  • 1988 WL 21458

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claim of fraudulent misrepresentation requires proof that the defendant misrepresented a material fact
  • holding that a claim of fraudulent misrepresentation requires proof that the plaintiff suffered damage as a result of reliance on the misrepresentation
  • holding that a claim of fraudulent misrepresentation requires proof that the plaintiff relied on the misrepresentation
  • summary judgment affirmed on promissory estoppel claim where claim was based on promise that employee would “never be fired” so long as he did the job properly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.