Prangley v. Comerford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Delaware’s similar savings statute “reflects a public policy preference for deciding cases on their merits”
• explaining that the Savings Statute is implicated “where the plaintiff has filed a timely lawsuit”
• holding Delaware has “a public policy preference for deciding cases on their merits.”
• equitable “affirmative defenses, such as laches, are not ordinarily well-suited for treatment” at the motion to dismiss stage
• “A court of equity moves upon considerations of conscience, good faith, and reasonable diligence.”
• “[In] ruling on a motion to dismiss under Court of Chancery Rule 12(b)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).