Prall v. Indiana National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a party to the terms of boilerplate language where he was a sophisticated party and did not contend that the boilerplate language was ambiguous or that he agreed to it under economic duress
• finding claims to be barred by a mutual release where the release did not contain limiting language and the “clear language of the release states it applies to all and any claims or actions”
• Prall testified he had independently investigated Indiana National Bank’s representations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).