Skip to main content
· 4/10/1997

Prairie Wood Products v. Glickman

Citations

  • 971 F. Supp. 457
  • 28 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20085
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16879
  • 1997 WL 432080

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[t]he Forest Service Handbook . . . provides guidelines for determining whether a forest plan amendment is significant” and listing the four factors
  • stating that “[t]he APA ... is merely a vehicle for carrying substantive challenges to court and does not provide a cause of action independent from the substantive laws governing agency action.”
  • alternative holding that agency’s finding of no significant impact was not arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.