PRAGMATUS AV, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the Court’s fast- paced docket invites forum shopping
• recognizing that the Court’s fast- paced docket invites forum shopping
• noting concern of “being swamped with patent infringement cases” that bear a minimal connection to the District
• identifying “[r]elevant considerations in evaluating the ‘interest of justice,”” such as “the pendency of a related action” (citation omitted)
• noting concern of “being swamped with patent infringement cases” that bear a minimal connection to the District
• finding the plaintiffs connection to this District “tenuous” because plaintiff was a “ ‘non-practicing entity,’ ” who did “not research and develop new technology but rather acquire[d] patents, license[d] the technology, and sue[d] alleged infringers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).