Prader v. Grim
Citations
- 13 Cal. 585
- 1859 Cal. LEXIS 206
Syllabus
<p>The usual bond being given, an order was made to show cause (Aug. 29th) why an injunction should not issue. A restraining order, “ in the meantime,” was issued. The case was continued until Oct. 10th, when, on hearing, the order was dissolved, injunction denied, and suit dismissed. Action on the bond. Held, that the restraining order embraces the time between its issuance and the hearing, and that damages may be had beyond Aug. 29th.</p> <p>Counsel fees for dissolving this order are recoverable on the bond. And this, though the fee was paid after August 29th, provided the retainer were before.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding writ of mandamus was the appropriate remedy to compel reinstatement of a fireman who was suspended in violation of the Civil Service Act
- mandamus appropriate to compel reinstatement of firefighter who was suspended in violation of the Civil Service Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.