Skip to main content
· 11/7/1974

Practy v. State

Citations

  • 525 S.W.2d 677
  • 1974 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “proceedings in this State for revocation . . . more than comply with the mere minimal requirements stated in Morrissey and Gagnon”
  • “This State’s procedure for revocation of sentence suspension and probation is an orderly one affording a probationer full protection of his constitutional right to due process.”
  • “This State’s procedure for revocation of sentence suspension and probation is an orderly one affording a probationer full protection of his constitutional right to due process.”
  • “This [s]tate’s procedure for revocation of sentence suspension and probation is an orderly one affording a probationer full protection of his constitutional right to due process.”
  • “This State’s procedure for revocation of sentence suspension and probation is an orderly one affording a probationer full protection of his constitutional right to due process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oliver, Walker, Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.