Skip to main content
· 4/22/1980

Practical Offset, Inc. v. Davis

Citations

  • 404 N.E.2d 516
  • 83 Ill. App. 3d 566
  • 39 Ill. Dec. 132
  • 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 2755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “an attorney’s duty to his client exists in relation to the scope of the representation sought by the client and undertaken by the attorney”
  • defendant's bald assertion in his deposition was little better than his denial in the answer to the complaint, neither of which was sufficient to give rise to a question of fact to preclude summary judgment
  • defendant’s bald assertion in his deposition was little better than his denial in the answer to the complaint, neither of which was sufficient to give rise to a question of fact to preclude summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stamos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.