Ppg Industries, Inc. v. The United States, and Vitro Flotado, S.A. And Vidrio Plano De Mexico, S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff failed to show that the alleged missing information addressed the issue at hand or cast doubt on Commerce’s conclusion
• highlighting the importance of “the actual make-up of the eligible firms” to Commerce’s grouping decisions in specificity analyses
• the court evaluates if the evidence on the record “could reasonably lead to [Commerce’s] conclusion”
• “[F]or this court to reverse and remand for further investigation, PPG would have to show that the ITA abused its discretion in not conducting further investigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).