Pozo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the mere fact that the defendant was driving at an excessive speed, between 67 and 90 m.p.h., in a residential neighborhood was enough to bring his case in line with Copertino and justify denying his motion for judgment of acquittal
• holding that denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal was proper where defendant driving between 67 and 90 miles per hour in a residential area with a speed limit of 35 miles per hour, along with other factors demonstrating inattention
• “[A] defendant must either show inherent prejudice or actual prejudice to the fairness of the fact-finding process in order to establish a violation of the defendant’s constitutional right to a fair trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).