Poyzer v. McGraw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that loss of enjoyment of life is a factor to be considered as a part of future pain and suffering and that it would be plainly duplicative to allow a separate award for loss of enjoyment of life
• recognizing \loss of enjoyment of life as a factor to be considered as part of future pain and suffering\
• noting a “function of special verdicts is to compel a jury to more accurately focus on what it properly should”
• “[I]t is commonly thought to be inappropriate in a special verdict submission for counsel to direct the jury’s attention to the impact of any specific findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).