Skip to main content
· 2/17/1989

Powers v. Stuart-James Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 707 F. Supp. 499
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1697
  • 1989 WL 15942

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that individual issues did not outweigh substantial common questions
  • holding that individual issues did not outweigh substantial common questions
  • noting the “number of procedural devices available” to handle unmanageable class issues, such as “subelassification, bifurcation and reconsideration of class certification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kovachevich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.