Skip to main content
· 11/28/2001

Powers v. Rockford Stop-N-Go, Inc.

Citations

  • 761 N.E.2d 237
  • 326 Ill. App. 3d 511
  • 260 Ill. Dec. 393
  • 2001 Ill. App. LEXIS 898

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court abused its discretion by awarding fees to plaintiff who won $875 judgment on one count but lost on its primary claim, which sought damages of more than $50,000
  • finding that plaintiff’s success on a separate issue was “irrelevant to the question of attorney fees because the trial court held that this was a matter independent of the lease”
  • requiring consid- eration of “(3) the novelty and difficulty of the questions” and (6) the time and labor required”
  • requiring consideration of “(2) the nature of the cause” and “(4) the amount and importance of the subject matter”
  • requiring consideration of “(2) the nature of the cause” and “(4) the amount and importance of the subject matter”
  • requiring consid- eration of “(3) the novelty and difficulty of the questions” and (6) the time and labor required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hutchinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.