· 12/2/2008
Powers v. Richards
Citations
- 549 F.3d 505
- 28 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 804
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 24322
- 2008 WL 5061050
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- resolving inquiry as a matter of law when plaintiff did not dispute that the official job description accurately explained the position responsibili‐ ties
- resolving inquiry as a matter of law when plaintiff did not dispute that the official job description accurately explained the position responsibili‐ ties
- policy or 26 contract language prohibiting employee from being dismissed without just cause generally suffices to create property interest
- termination of certain lower- level government employees because of their political 1 Until the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Gross v. FBL Financial Servs., Inc., 129 S. Ct. 2343 (2009
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Manion, Rovner, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.