Powers v. Hubbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This Court will not use the rubric of legal sufficiency to usurp the powers of ... factfinders and enter our own view of guilt.”
• appellant speculated that his cup of beer was laced with cocaine by drug users he was investigating
• appellant speculated that his cup of beer was laced with cocaine by drug users he was investigating
• \This Court will not use the rubric of legal sufficiency to usurp the powers of . . . factfinders and enter our own view of guilt.\
• “ ‘[W]hether to draw an inference of wrongfulness is a question to be decided by the factfinder using the standard of reasonable doubt.’ ” (alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Ford, 23 M.J. 331, 335 (C.M.A. 1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).