Skip to main content

Powers v. Ellis

Citations

  • 520 P.2d 431
  • 55 Haw. 414
  • 1974 Haw. LEXIS 115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “to the extent that an order of sale merely implements matters contained in a decree of foreclosure, there is no need to take a separate appeal from it,” but an appellate court can review the order of sale for “errors unique to it”
  • explaining that “to the extent that an order of sale merely implements matters contained in a decree of foreclosure, there is no need to take a separate appeal from it,” but an appellate court can review the order of sale for “errors unique to it”
  • explaining that “to the extent that an order of sale merely implements matters contained in a decree of foreclosure, there is no need to take a separate appeal from it,” but an appellate court can review the order of sale for “errors unique to it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, Kobayashi, Levinson, Ogata, Richardson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.