Ninth Circuit· 10/20/2000
Powers v. Eichen
Citations
- 229 F.3d 1249
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11303
- 47 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1330
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8486
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 26057
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We have ... 10 established twenty-five percent of the recovery as a ‘benchmark’ for attorneys’ fees calculations 11 under the percentage-of-recovery approach.”
- “We have ... 21 established twenty-five percent of the recovery as a ‘benchmark’ for attorneys’ fees calculations 22 under the percentage-of-recovery approach.”
- upward departure acceptable when 17 expressly explained
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Ninth Circuit· 2003-04-29· cited 1,028×
- Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. Mercury Interactive Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2010-08-18· cited 341×
- Nicklos Ciolino v. Theodore FrankNinth Circuit· 2013-05-15· cited 88×
- Monterrubio v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.E.D. California· 2013-05-14· cited 72×
- Vasquez v. Coast Valley Roofing, Inc.E.D. California· 2010-03-09· cited 65×
- Stanger v. China Electric Motor, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2016-01-15· cited 49×
- Edward Huyer v. Steven BuckleyEighth Circuit· 2017-02-16· cited 30×
- Ogbuehi v. Comcast of California/Colorado/Florida/Oregon, Inc.E.D. California· 2014-10-02· cited 23×
- Couser v. Comenity BankC.D. California· 2015-05-27· cited 21×
- Knisley v. Network Associates, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2002-12-06· cited 10×
- Morris v. Lifescan, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2003-01-16· cited 10×
- Torchia v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.E.D. California· 2014-12-29· cited 10×
- Jones v. GN Netcom, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2011-08-19· cited 7×
- In Re Cylink Securities LitigationN.D. California· 2003-07-23· cited 5×
- Cox v. Clarus Marketing Group, LLCS.D. California· 2013-04-29· cited 5×
- Hernandez v. Restoration Hardware, Inc.California Court of Appeals, 4th District· 2016-03-14· cited 2×
- David Oetting v. David A. SosneEighth Circuit· 2021-10-08
- Tri-Villa Trust v. Universal Studios, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-03-07
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 4,651×
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationNinth Circuit· 1986-08-15· cited 591×
- Marino v. OrtizSupreme Court· 1988-02-22· cited 363×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1995-02-09· cited 199×
- Paul, Johnson, Alston & Hunt v. GraultyNinth Circuit· 1989-09-27· cited 195×
- Powers v. EichenNinth Circuit· 2000-10-20· cited 119×
- Marshall v. Holiday Magic, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1977-03-08· cited 108×
- Albert Zucker Sarah Mandelbaum, Weiss & Yourman Stull, Stull & Brody v. Occidental Petroleum Corporation Ray Irani Howard Collins, Walter KaufmannNinth Circuit· 1999-10-19· cited 106×
- Felzen v. AndreasSeventh Circuit· 1998-01-21· cited 104×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. BolgerThird Circuit· 1993-08-18· cited 103×
- Gottlieb v. WilesTenth Circuit· 1993-12-16· cited 98×
- Arthur S. Guthrie, Keiter Parrott v. David C. EvansEleventh Circuit· 1987-04-24· cited 71×
- Walker v. City of MesquiteFifth Circuit· 1988-10-31· cited 63×
- Lobatz v. U.S. West Cellular of California, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2000-08-25· cited 57×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1997-03-24· cited 54×
- Rosenbaum v. MacAllisterTenth Circuit· 1995-08-15· cited 45×
- J.A. Shults and Joan Shults, Hugh Brown v. Champion International CorporationSixth Circuit· 1994-11-07· cited 38×
- In Re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust LitigationSeventh Circuit· 1997-07-31· cited 31×
- Kaplan v. RandSecond Circuit· 1999-09-14· cited 31×
- Powers v. EichenS.D. California· 1997-05-23· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.