· 9/25/1964
Powers v. Coates
Citations
- 203 A.2d 425
- 1964 D.C. App. LEXIS 281
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[i]t was error for the trial court to rule that the doctrine of res ipsa could not be considered because not pleaded” because “[t]he doctrine is a procedural rule of evidence and is not a rule of pleading”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hood, Quinn, Myers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.