Skip to main content
· 9/25/1964

Powers v. Coates

Citations

  • 203 A.2d 425
  • 1964 D.C. App. LEXIS 281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[i]t was error for the trial court to rule that the doctrine of res ipsa could not be considered because not pleaded” because “[t]he doctrine is a procedural rule of evidence and is not a rule of pleading”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hood, Quinn, Myers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.