Skip to main content
· 8/8/2008

Powerhouse Productions, Inc. v. Scott

Citations

  • 260 S.W.3d 693
  • 28 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 44
  • 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 6019
  • 2008 WL 3196174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding any post-agreement provision of confidential information to employee could not supply consideration, as evidence did not show employer had provided additional information “because [employee] signed the agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Bridges, Mazzant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.