· 8/8/2008
Powerhouse Productions, Inc. v. Scott
Citations
- 260 S.W.3d 693
- 28 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 44
- 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 6019
- 2008 WL 3196174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding any post-agreement provision of confidential information to employee could not supply consideration, as evidence did not show employer had provided additional information “because [employee] signed the agreement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright, Bridges, Mazzant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.