Skip to main content
· 11/6/1970

Power v. McNair

Citations

  • 177 S.E.2d 551
  • 255 S.C. 150
  • 1970 S.C. LEXIS 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding parties cannot by consent confer jurisdiction on the court to render a declaratory judgment
  • noting that where adjudication of a question “would settle no legal rights of the parties,” it would be “only advisory and, therefore, beyond the intended purpose and scope of a declaratory judgment”
  • explaining the DJA \should be liberally construed to accomplish its intended purpose of affording a speedy and inexpensive method of deciding legal disputes and of settling legal rights and relationships\
  • stating this Court \simply refuse[s] to enter the field of advisory opinions\
  • “In the event the Court should try issues not raised by the pleadings, it shall state in the record all such issues tried and the reason therefor.”
  • the parties cannot by consent confer jurisdiction on the court to render a declaratory judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Moss, Bussey, Brailsford, Littlejohn, JJ-

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.