Skip to main content
· 9/30/2004

Power Authority of New York v. United States

Citations

  • 62 Fed. Cl. 376
  • 2004 U.S. Claims LEXIS 253
  • 2004 WL 2212088

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that dicta in a prior case had no binding effect on a court's decision in a later case
  • explaining that dicta in a prior case had no binding effect on a court's decision in a later case
  • explaining that dicta in a prior case had no binding effect on this court’s decision in a later case
  • explaining that dicta has no binding effect on a court’s decision in a later case
  • stating that three factors are considered in determining whether statute is penal or remedial: (1) whether statute redresses individual wrongs or wrongs to public; (2) whether recovery runs to individual or to public; and (3
  • statement in earlier case that was admittedly dicta had “no binding effect on this court’s decision in this case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Damich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.