· 9/30/2004
Power Authority of New York v. United States
Citations
- 62 Fed. Cl. 376
- 2004 U.S. Claims LEXIS 253
- 2004 WL 2212088
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that dicta in a prior case had no binding effect on a court's decision in a later case
- explaining that dicta in a prior case had no binding effect on a court's decision in a later case
- explaining that dicta in a prior case had no binding effect on this court’s decision in a later case
- explaining that dicta has no binding effect on a court’s decision in a later case
- stating that three factors are considered in determining whether statute is penal or remedial: (1) whether statute redresses individual wrongs or wrongs to public; (2) whether recovery runs to individual or to public; and (3
- statement in earlier case that was admittedly dicta had “no binding effect on this court’s decision in this case”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Damich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.