Skip to main content
· 11/25/1867

Powell v. Davis' Admr.

Citations

  • 2 Ky. Op. 137
  • 1867 Ky. LEXIS 438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing Hologram as an outlier and applying the Iqbal/Twombly pleading standard to a patent invalidity counterclaim
  • applying the Twombly and Iqbal standard to the defendant's invalidity counterclaim
  • dismissing patent invalidity counterclaim when defendant merely pleaded that the claims at issue were “invalid for failure to satisfy one or more of the conditions of 2 One of Defendants’ allegations is that “[p]ursuant to Rule 11(b)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.