Powell v. Computer Credit, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a letter that contained the creditor's name, return address, and phone number was a letter from the creditor, even though the letter was printed on a debt collector's stationery
• printing creditor’s return address and phone number on the letter and including an instruction to contact creditor was a “clear[ ] indication]” that the communication was from the creditor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).