Powell v. Bunn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because statute was phrased, “no person in Oregon shall be subjected to discrimination,” Supreme Court understood that all actors were prohibited from engaging in discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Eastern Oregon Mining Ass'n v. Department of Environmental Quality
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-07-14· cited 36×
• Providence Health System v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 16×
• Derschon v. Belleque
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 11×
• Middleton v. Department of Human Services
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-23· cited 6×
• Bridgestar Capital Corp. v. Nguyen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-14· cited 6×
• Noble v. Oregon Water Resources Department
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 2×
• Eastern Oregon Mining Association v. DEQ
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-07-14

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• Powell v. Bunn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-12-11· cited 27×
• Powell v. Bunn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-03-02· cited 7×