Skip to main content
· 4/8/1994

Powell v. American Charter Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Citations

  • 514 N.W.2d 326
  • 245 Neb. 551
  • 1994 Neb. LEXIS 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the state with the most significant relationship in the transaction was the state where the parties contracted and resided, where the subject matter was located, and where performance took place
  • deciding the state with the most significant relationship to the transaction and the parties is the state where the parties contracted, negotiated, and resided; where the subject matter was located; and where performance was to take place
  • deciding the state with the most significant relationship to the transaction and the parties is the state where the parties contracted, negotiated, and resided; where the subject matter was located; and where performance was to take place
  • adopting approach set forth in Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws § 188(1971) in dealing with conflict of laws in contract actions to determine which law to apply
  • adopting Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws choice of law analysis
  • adopting Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws choice of law analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boslaugh, Caporale, Fahrnbruch, Grant, Hastings, Lanphier, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.