Poux v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “there was no evidence before the jury to support the defendant’s contention that the jury could have inferred that the defendant acted with a less culpable mental state”
• ‘‘[u]nder Connecticut law, a defendant may be convicted as an accessory even though he was charged only as a principal as long as the evidence presented at trial is sufficient to establish accessorial conduct’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).